As the days before the presidential election dwindle, it’s starting to appear as if the American public won’t be able to see the two major candidates debate each other. One candidate continues to say “anytime, anyplace,” while the other will only agree to a “my house, my rules,” situation.

Unfortunately, this situation mirrors the perception of political discourse today. We often hear commentators and frustrated observers repeat the refrain, “We can’t even talk to each other anymore,” a sobering sentiment that concedes that listening and understanding aren’t even on the menu.

Debates have long been a cornerstone of the democratic process, offering a platform for direct engagement and scrutiny. The last debate certainly showed how much they can affect a campaign. Debates also force candidates to confront each other as well questions from the public and the media. Without them, the electorate is left with campaign ads, social media and political pundits, which don’t foster informed decisions.

We hope that behind the scenes the two sides are working on some sort of compromise. It may not be the action that brings the country closer together, but it would be a step in the right direction. It would show that a dialogue is possible.